Institution has Performance Appraisal System for
teaching and non-teaching staff
The institution has
an effective performance appraisal system for teaching and non-teaching staff.
The overall supervision of the academic and administration functions of the
institution is performed by the principal who receives a report as all feedback
and interact with the teaching faculty, staff students and guardians to gain
first hand information on the academic and administrations of the institution. Every year the
outgoing students carry out and submit teacher evaluation and campus evaluation
surveys. The teacher evaluation forms have criteria related to aspects of
teaching on which the opinion of the students is sought. The duly filled in
forms are analyzed by the Principal and the feedback thus obtained is
judiciously addressed for the betterment of the teaching-learning process.
The principal evaluates the self appraisal reports of the faculty members. The
feedback received is used to identify areas of improvement in the academic and
administrative functions. Faculty
assessments are made on the basis of self appraisal reports, students and
stakeholders feedback. Concerned
faculty is informed by the principal about the feedback and asked to implement
the desirable changes. The management promotes faculty for carrier progression.
In cases where laxity or lacunae is observed the
teacher in question is counseled by the Principal and urged to improve his/her
performance in the interest of professional upgradation and better
service-delivery to our primary stakeholders, namely the students. The
performance of the non-teaching staff is appraised by the final year students
in the campus evaluation survey. They are assessed on the parameters of
efficiency, cordiality and overall helpfulness. These questionnaires too are
analyzed by the Principal who counsels those
non-teaching staff members whose performance has invited criticism or needs
improvement. The performance of those teaching and non-teaching staff members
who have not fared well in the students’ feedback is closely monitored. An improvement in the subsequent performance
of the said staff members has usually been noticed. In the infrequent instances
when this does not happen systematic reminders are issued to the concerned
staff member in a bid to correct imbalances and restore optimal efficiency in
the institution.
No comments:
Post a Comment